City of Fairbury, Nebraska
 
   
City of Fairbury, Nebraska:
 
    City Council
          Administration
          Agendas - Minutes
          Meeting Schedule

    City Departments
    City Services
    Community Events
    Facts and Statistics
    General Information
    Mayor of Fairbury
    Parks and Recreation
 
    Home
    Links
    Sitemap

Regular Meeting

September 7, 2010

 

The Mayor and Council of the City of Fairbury met in regular session in the Council Chambers located at 612 D Street, Fairbury, Nebraska, on the 7th day of September 2010, at 7:30 p.m.   Mayor Homer L. Ward called the meeting to order.

 

Notice of meeting was given in advance thereof by publication in the Fairbury Journal News, Fairbury, Nebraska, the designated method of giving notice, as shown by affidavit of publication.  The Open Meetings Act was posted in the meeting room and pointed out by Mayor Ward as required by law.

 

Roll call found the following Council Members present: Doug Brown, Ed Friesen, Roger Bailey, Tim Polson, Phil Rogge, Brad Kuzelka, and Kelly Davis.  Absent: Shirley Bender.

 

Mayor Ward called for the submittal of forms to request future agenda items.  No forms were submitted during the meeting. 

 

Mayor Ward read the Consent Agenda: 

1.      Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of August 17, 2010.

2.      Approval of claims.

 

Rogge moved to approve the Consent Agenda.  Motion seconded by Davis.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Rogge, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Bender absent.  Motion carried. 

 

Mayor Ward opened the Budget Hearing and Budget Summary for the 2010-2011 Fiscal Year.  

Brian Blobaum of Blobaum & Busboom, P.C. explained the budget process has two legal items that it addresses.  One is setting the dollar amount of property tax request that we will be levying on properties for the coming year for the General Fund and the Bond Fund; and the other is, setting an overall expenditure limit for the City for the entire year.  Blobaum stated this hearing will be the City’s final chance to ask for property tax – we can not change this request following this hearing. Blobaum stated all the extra data of spreadsheets and line items are internal numbers that are put together.  The total of those creates a legal limit; so we’re not limited by line item or by fund, we’re limited by the total.  Blobaum stated the overall property tax asking for this budget, which was published, in the General Fund for the 2010-2011 Fiscal Year is $509,427.00 and in the Bond Fund is $252,748.00.  This is a total tax asking of $762,175.00, which compared with the prior year of $753,962.00, this is a 1.1% total increase. (Last year the tax asking in the General Fund was $503,952.00 and in the Bond Fund was $250,000.00.)   The tax levy request for the General Fund is .472¢, which is the maximum amount we can ask for the General Fund, because we allocated the remainder of the 50¢ to the Airport Authority.  The municipal levy limit is 45¢ plus 5¢ for interlocal agreements.  The Bond Fund is not limited and the City has chosen to leave it at the same levy as last year with a slight valuation increase which resulted in $2,700.00 more tax.  The overall limits of expenditures that are set up in this budget are the cash balances that we have on hand, plus anticipated revenues, less normal operating expenditures.  Then we have budgeted basically all of the money that we have generated plus our cash reserves to be able to be spent as capital outlay items.   The expenditure limits in the General Fund for 2010-2011 we’re budgeting $6,431,824.00, in the Bond Fund for 2010-2011 we’re budgeting $671,692.00 and in the Keno Fund for 2010-2011 we’re budgeting $53,732.00.  Blobaum stated the fluctuation of the expenditure amounts in the Bond Fund the previous four years – in 2007-2008 and 2009-2010 this shows bond refinancing.   Blobaum stated in the Bond Fund the expenditure limit is budgeted at $671,692.00; the actual bond payment will be about half of that amount in the coming year.   Blobaum stated he budgeted the remaining $335,483.00 to be spent; so potentially there could be a prepayment however should have approximately $100,000.00 left in the Bond Fund on October 1, 2011 as we build up towards the December 2011 bond payment – so at the end of September 30, 2011 we should have about $230,000.00 extra money in this fund.  Blobaum continued with an overview of cash positions historically and for the upcoming year, stating that in comparing the General Fund budget to prior years budgets – he looks at budgeted reduction in cash reserves and adjusts for rebudgeted funds such as LB840 (which really isn’t our money to spend on anything); so subtracts that out of the reduction.  In comparison, in 2008-2009 we budgeted to reduce cash reserves with those adjustments by $113,629.00 and actually increased the cash reserves by $283,480.00, in 2009-2010, the current year, we budgeted to reduce cash reserves by $118,854.00 and estimating we will actually increase by approximately $108,303.00 and for 2010-2011 we have budgeted to reduce cash reserves by $54,854.00.  However, we don’t know how the current year will turn out; if we will have an increase or decrease; usually we come out better than what we have said.  The estimated year end cash reserves, on October 1, 2010, in the governmental funds (not utility funds) should be approximately $1,783,000.00 of which about $723,000.00 is reserved; not available for general purposes such as salaries, etc.  The reserved funds, which we can not touch, are LB840 of $620,000.00, fire equipment of $22,000.00 and the remainder is grants and trust funds.  In the early 80’s the expendable cash reserve was as low as about $400,000.00 and in the 90’s the reserve reached as high as $1.5 million.   Blobaum stated the current accessible cash reserves of about $1,060,000.00, of the City, have reached a thirty year historical average; we’re in a pretty good position.  No one else addressed the Council during the public hearing.  Mayor Ward declared the hearing closed.

 

Mayor Ward opened the Public Hearing setting of the final tax request for the

2010-2011 Fiscal Year at $509,427.00 for the General Fund and $252,748.00 for the Bond Fund.  Blobaum stated this hearing is a special hearing that is required when the dollar amount of property tax request has changed from the prior year; we have to set the new dollar amounts.   No one else addressed the Council during the public hearing.  Mayor Ward declared the hearing closed. 

 

Mayor Ward opened the Public Hearing concerning LB840 funds for a “Performance Based Grant” in the amount of $20,000.00 for the “Sweet Creations” project.  Craig Eberle with Southeast Nebraska Development District (SENDD) office in Lincoln, Program Administrator for the Fairbury LB840 Program, addressed the Council.  Eberle stated the purpose of this public hearing concerns using $20,000.00 of the LB840 Local Option Sales Tax funds for financing under the approved Economic Development Plan; if approved by the City Council, funds would be provided to Sweet Creations, owned by Carmen Ragland, in the amount of $20,000.00 as a performance based grant to assist with purchasing equipment and fixtures to complete start-up costs of this new bakery and catering business.  Eberle stated this business has secured an additional $25,000.00 of project funding for working capital, supplies, inventory, fixtures, and other equipment.  Eberle stated this business will be required to create at least one full time equivalent job position within twelve months of this agreement, and retain that position for at least twenty-four months thereafter from closing of the grant fund distribution.  Eberle stated this business will provide a wide range of baked goods (including homemade cinnamon rolls, hamburger buns, cakes, pies, cupcakes, donuts, brownies, cookies, and kolaches) as well as a full catering menu for large or small functions.  Eberle stated this project meets the LB840 criteria and the Economic Development Review Committee recommends the City Council approve obligating $20,000.00 as a performance based grant from the LB840 Economic Development Plan for this application under the conditions of the final Grant Conditions Agreement.  Eberle stated Ragland plans to lease an existing commercial kitchen space in the lower level of the Pinecrest Apartment Complex located at 1011 K Street in Fairbury.  Linda Knight addressed the Council.  Knight stated she has no problems with the catering but does with the cakes.  Knight doesn’t feel the City is big enough for another bakery – we already have Ray’s and Schroeder’s – we don’t have enough people in this town to support that many bakeries making cakes for weddings, etc.  Knight stated her daughter, who owns the Country Cottage at Prairie Pointe Plaza (which she also received funding from the LB840 program), has worked very hard to keep her business going; this will hurt her business.  No one else addressed the Council during the public hearing.  Mayor Ward declared the hearing closed. 

 

Rogge moved to approve the 2010-2011 Fiscal Year Budget as presented.  Motion seconded by Kuzelka.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Rogge, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Bender absent.  Motion carried. 

 

Blobaum presented the City of Fairbury Enterprise Funds (utility funds) Financial Statements and Schedules for Year Ending April 30, 2010.  Blobaum stated the Enterprise Funds are eventually included in the City of Fairbury Financial Statements on September 30, but the April 30th numbers are used.  Blobaum stated every audit they do for government entities, they perform their audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in the GAO yellow book (auditing book).  The GAO requires additional steps regarding the analysis of internal controls over compliance.  These standards require they perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are materially correct.  Blobaum stated his firm is issuing a clean audit opinion but that he is required to report internal control deficiencies.  Blobaum stated one significant internal control deficiency is the lack of separation of duties, which they report in every governmental entity they audit; as small governmental entities do not have enough people to perform every financial duty separately.  Blobaum stated another control deficiency is the accounting cut off each year – not a big issue, but the monthly financial statements are presented as if the power payables is a reduction in cash rather than a payable – doesn’t actually get paid until the 20th of the following month; they suggest these be estimated and the financial statements be prepared in a more timely manner for the Board of Public Works (BOPW); and another deficiency is a small interfund balance in the amount of $15,000.00 – they suggest this be eliminated.   Blobaum continued with an overview stating in the cash balance and cash flow data for the year 2010 – had a beginning cash balance of $4,824,151.00, with a net income of $897,559.00 and with the depreciation expense and fixed assets and long-term debt adjustments – ended with a cash balance of $5,581.464.00 – compared to 2007 the beginning cash balance was $2,721,010.00 and the end of 2010 was $5,581,464.00 – this shows have had some very good years in between.  Blobaum stated the biggest item involved in the utility funds is the purchase and sale of electricity.  Blobaum stated the total power sales for the 2010 Fiscal Year ended with an increase of $268,671.00 which is a 5% increase.  Blobaum stated the total power cost for the 2010 Fiscal Year, which includes the purchase of electricity, power for water pumping and power for the sewer plant, ended with an increase of $217,791.00 which is a 7% increase.  Blobaum stated the overall power margin for 2010 was 48.3% compared to last year which was 49.7% which is a 1.3% decrease from last year showing purchases versus sales of electricity.  Blobaum stated something to be watched would be, if we’re creating $700,000.00 of cash – the 1% less margin may not be an issue; but 1% of margin is basically $200,000.00.  Blobaum stated i.e. if we have a 5% increase of the purchase of power, we probably can’t just eat that – would probably have to pass on power increases.  Blobaum stated the BOPW is currently working on an electric rate study.  Blobaum stated the total cost of labor for the light and water department actually decreased by 2% this fiscal year compared to an increase of 6% last year; which shows a good record of holding down the line of labor costs. The total cost of labor for the sewer department shows a huge increase this year as have very few employees in this department and one employee also retired this year so having to train someone new this will fluctuate based on those issues; this department shows a 36% greater payroll cost for this year.  Blobaum stated the labor costs were increasing faster, back in 2002 through 2006, than what the increases in utility revenues were; this was reaching a very thin margin between the gross profit between the utilities that we were selling versus the labor costs.  In the 2007 year their were some power and utility rate hikes that went into affect and also a policy instated to hold labor costs down – do some early retirements and try to hold replacements to a minimum of retiring employees.  The light & water department has really held the line since then with the payroll costs and thus we’ve created that margin of $600,000.00 - $800,000.00 of increases in cash the last three years.  Blobaum stated the light & water department shows a net income at the year ending April 30, 2010 of $772,561.00 versus $712,260.00 last year; and the sewer disposal department shows a net income of $124,998.00 versus $119,712.00 last year.  Blobaum stated in 2007, 2008, and 2009 have had definite increases in gross profit which has contributed to strong net incomes.   Bailey moved to approve the City of Fairbury Enterprise Funds Financial Statements and Schedules for Year Ending April 30, 2010.  Motion seconded by Rogge.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Rogge, Kuzelka and Davis voted “yes.” Bender absent.  Motion carried. 

 

Mayor Ward read from the agenda “consider City purchasing property located at 415 West 8th Street”.  City Administrator Joseph Parker stated at the last Council meeting he had suggested the Council members check this property out to see if they would be interested in purchasing this property which is located across the street from the Girl Scout Cabin and the City Park. Parker stated he had contacted the owner to see if she would be willing to sell this property to the City; and she is.  Parker stated she would sell the property to the City for $200.00 plus property taxes of approximately $155.00.  Parker stated the City would demo the house.  Council member Doug Brown asked Parker if the City would demo the house themselves and if we’re good to go with the asbestos and everything.  Parker stated the asbestos testing will need to be done – it is a small house so hopefully this wouldn’t be much; but we will have that expense also.   Parker stated he wanted to wait on that to make sure the Council wants to go ahead with the purchase before he did anything further.  Parker stated the City would demo the house themselves.  Brown moved to approve giving the City Administrator the authority to pursue purchasing the property located at 415 West 8th Street.  Motion seconded by Friesen.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Rogge, Kuzelka and Davis voted “yes.” Bender absent.  Motion carried. 

  

Mayor Ward read from the agenda “consideration of the distribution of $10,000.00 of funding to “Discs N Dat” project”.  Parker stated the contract that had to be reviewed has not been reviewed adequately by the attorney representing Discs N Dat and they requested this be postponed until the next Council meeting.  Bailed moved to postpone agenda item E4 - consideration of the distribution of $10,000.00 of funding to “Discs N Dat” project until the next Council meeting.  Motion seconded by Rogge.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Rogge, Kuzelka and Davis voted “yes.” Bender absent.  Motion carried. 

 

Polson moved to adopt Resolution No. 788 setting the 2010-2011 property tax request at $509,427.00 for the General Fund and $252,748.00 for the Bond Fund.  Motion seconded by Rogge.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Rogge, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Bender absent.  Motion carried. 

 

Brown moved to adopt Resolution No. 789 obligating LB840 Funds to “Sweet Creations” for a “Performance Based Grant” in the amount of $20,000.00.  Motion seconded by Davis.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Rogge, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Polson abstained since he works for a company that has a bakery.  Bender absent.  Motion carried. 

 

Within the City Administrators report, Joseph Parker stated he received an email from Deb Hellbusch inviting everyone to attend a meeting on Thursday, September 9, 2010 at 1:00 p.m. at the lower level of Union Bank to discuss lead-based paint. 

 

Brown stated Deb Hellbusch has been working on a grant for healthy homes/lead paint in the amount of $2.3 million; if we were the recipient of this grant, Hellbusch feels we could identify and rectify between 120-140 homes.  She needs help with representation to try to get this grant.  The meeting is with Public Health Solutions.

 

Rogge moved to adjourn the meeting.  Motion seconded by Friesen.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Rogge, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Bender absent.  Motion carried.  Meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m.

                                                             Homer L. Ward, Mayor

             ATTEST:  Sharyl Preston, City Clerk

 

 
 
Thanks for visiting FairburyNebraska.org!
Copyright © 2001-2005 FairburyNebraska.org All Rights Reserved.