City of Fairbury, Nebraska
 
   
City of Fairbury, Nebraska:
 
    City Council
          Administration
          Agendas - Minutes
          Meeting Schedule

    City Departments
    City Services
    Community Events
    Facts and Statistics
    General Information
    Mayor of Fairbury
    Parks and Recreation
 
    Home
    Links
    Sitemap

Regular Meeting

May 4, 2010

 

The Mayor and Council of the City of Fairbury met in regular session in the Council Chambers located at 612 D Street, Fairbury, Nebraska, on the 4th day of May 2010,

at 7:30 p.m.   Mayor Homer L. Ward called the meeting to order.

 

Notice of meeting was given in advance thereof by publication in the Fairbury Journal News, Fairbury, Nebraska, the designated method of giving notice, as shown by affidavit of publication.  The Open Meetings Act was posted in the meeting room and pointed out by Mayor Ward as required by law.

 

Roll call found the following Council Members present: Doug Brown, Ed Friesen, Roger Bailey, Tim Polson, Shirley Bender, Brad Kuzelka, and Kelly Davis.  Absent:  Beryl Lueders.

 

Mayor Ward called for the submittal of forms to request future agenda items.  No forms were submitted during the meeting. 

 

Mayor Ward read the Consent Agenda: 

1.      Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of April 20, 2010.

2.      Approval of claims.

3.      Consider resignation of Beryl Lueders from City Council Ward IV seat.

4.      Consider resignation of Ron Schacht from the Board of Public Works.

5.      Approval of the appointment of Brian Schmidt to the Board of Public Works as a replacement for Ron Schacht.  Term to expire January 2014.

 

Bender moved to approve the Consent Agenda.  Motion seconded by Bailey.  On roll call Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried. 

 

Bender moved to set a Public Hearing for May 18, 2010 at 7:30 p.m. concerning the Proprietary Budget and Budget Summary for the City of Fairbury Utilities for May 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.  Motion seconded by Kuzelka.  On roll call Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried. 

 

Davis moved to approve the request from the Board of Public Works (BOPW) to advertise for bids for the replacement of the power plant roof.  Motion seconded by Brown.  Mike Beachler, Superintendent of Utilities addressed the Council.  Beachler stated two roofs need to be replaced.  The barrel top roof, on the older part of the power plant which has the 4000 KWH generator in it, this consists of 8000 square feet of roofing that will need to be torn off and replaced with rubber material.  This has had some leakage and may have to replace some lumber.  The other roof is about 2700 square feet which has had some leakage around the vents.  They’re hoping they will be able to do the total project for about $60,000.00.

On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”    Motion carried. 

 

 

 

Kuzelka moved to approve the request from the BOPW regarding updating the Water System Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Improvements software and equipment.  Motion seconded by Polson.  Lincoln Williams with TMS addressed the Council.  Williams stated TMS does control systems, water, and waste water all over the state with the SCADA systems.  The City’s original system was installed in 1993 by TMS which is now obsolete and difficult to find replacement parts.  We’ve had the software for eight to nine years; so this will be updated.  New radios will be integrated into the new network.  Williams stated the system at Crystal Springs we’ve had for five to six years, so this system will remain. Council member Shirley Bender questioned the cost of updating the system.  Williams stated originally the project was going to be done in stages; but now it won’t work very well to do it in stages.  He added up all the stages with a total cost of $90,853.00; he’s offered a 10% discount to do it all together with a cost of $81,768.00 including sales tax.  Council member Doug Brown questioned if the BOPW needed to go out for bids for this project.  Beachler stated they do not need to go through the bid process for this project as the project is primarily for professional services – engineering – and not for construction of waterworks.  The City Attorney was consulted regarding the need for bidding.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”   Motion carried.

 

Polson moved to approve the request from the BOPW to purchase the New Holland L185 Skid Steer Loader, which they are currently leasing, for the amount of $29,900.00.  Motion seconded by Friesen.  Beachler stated with the original lease they could lease for one year; had to maintain the machine, keep the hours down, and after the year they would get a new machine to lease.  This program is no longer offered.  The lease program that is offered now from Diesel Power Equipment Company for this machine is a 60 month lease annual payment beginning 12 months after the contract date $9,839.60 totaling $49,198.00 or a 60 month lease semi-annual payment beginning 6 months after contract date $4,381.55 totaling $43,815.00, and an outright purchase price of $32,900.00.  Beachler stated after negotiating, Diesel Power Equipment gave them a lowball purchase price of $29,900.00.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”    Motion carried. 

 

Davis moved to approve the application for a Special Designated Liquor License for Meyer Vineyards, Inc. dba Superior Estates Winery for a Wine Sampling/Tasting event at the Fairbury Elks Lodge located at 525 G Street for their 100th Anniversary Celebration on June 11, 2010 from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.  Motion seconded by Bailey.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried. 

 

City Attorney David Bargen stated he reviewed the Maintenance/Management Agreement between the City of Fairbury and the Fairbury Area Softball Association which states the term of the agreement shall commence as of October 1, 2006, and terminate October 31, 2008.  The agreement also states it shall be automatically renewed from year to year unless either party shall give written notice of termination to the other at least six months prior to commencement of any renewal term.  According to this agreement, either party would have had to give notice by April 1, 2009 if they wanted to terminate the agreement for the current year.  The City sent a letter dated August 26, 2009, to the Fairbury Area Softball Association, which can act as a termination notice following the current term, but the agreement has rolled over November 1, 2009 for the current term.  Bargen stated the terms of the agreement dated October 1, 2006 through October 31, 2008 are still in effect since the agreement rolled over.  No action was taken.

 

Bargen stated the Maintenance/Management Agreement between the City of Fairbury and the Fairbury Area Softball Association which rolled over doesn’t address the Maintenance/Management Fee after the years specifically stated in the contract.  In May 2009 the City paid the Fairbury Area Softball Association $14,205.45 for Fiscal Year 2008-2009 which included a three percent per annum increase from the previous year which was $13,791.70.   Bargen stated that though it could be argued the contract fails for lack of an essential term – price – actions by the parties can supply a term, and since the City paid last year with the three percent increase, likely the better interpretation of the agreement is that now each time the agreement rolls over – it does so with the three percent increase per annum for the Maintenance/Management Fee.  The fee for 2009-2010 would be $14,631.62.  Council member Ed Friesen questioned City Administrator Joseph Parker regarding the letter he had received from the Fairbury Area Softball Association regarding the agreement and the fee to be paid by the City.  Parker stated the letter from the Softball Association states if the City agrees, the City can subtract $5,768.00 from the payment of $14,631.62 which would leave the payment from the City to the Association in the amount of $8,863.62.  The $5,768.00 is for lights, water and fertilizer which the City will pay.  Friesen moved to pay the Maintenance/Management Fee to the Fairbury Area Softball Association for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 in the amount of $8,863.62 with the Softball Association giving receipts for each expenditure to the City.  Motion seconded by Kuzelka.  Ed Durfee with the Fairbury Area Softball Association addressed the Council.  Durfee stated there are a few misunderstandings and lack of listening that needs to be cleared up.  They are open to negotiating a new contract when the season is over.  Durfee stated the Association will be accountable and give receipts to the City for the expenditures.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Bender moved to approve the request from Ron Ramsey to use the City Park for the 5th Annual Jefferson County Relay for Life on June 18 – 19, 2010.  Motion seconded by Polson. The Cancer Walk starts at 7:00 p.m. on June 18 until 7:00 a.m. on June 19, 2010.  The walking track will be on the road north of the horseshoe court around to the north side of the fountain and south of the shelter.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Bailey moved to approve the Letter of Engagement with Blobaum & Busboom P.C. for audit and budget preparation services for Fiscal Years ending September 30, 2010 – 2012. Motion seconded by Kuzelka.  Mayor Ward stated this firm has provided these services since 1980. On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Bender moved to approve the request from Blue Valley Community Action for permission to use the south side of the square on Thursday evenings starting June 17, 2010 beginning at 5:00 p.m. for the Farmer’s Market and use a portion of the southeast edge of the City Park (in front of the old playground/train engine area near the 5th Street entrance) for a Saturday morning Farmer’s Market beginning June 19, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.  Motion seconded by Davis.  Mayor Ward explained he had visited with someone that helps organize the Flea Market and they felt they should be able to charge the Farmer’s Market for a space during the Flea Market.  Mayor Ward explained to them the Farmer’s Market has already paid the fee to the City for being able to sell goods at the Farmer’s Market and the Flea Market should not also be charging a fee to them.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

Friesen moved to approve having the funds from the Fairbury Civic Foundation ~ Girl Scout Cabin Renovation Fund be deposited into the City of Fairbury – General Fund and keeping the account open for possible future donations.  Motion seconded by Bender.  Council member Tim Polson questioned if more work will be done to the cabin.  Friesen stated he had visited with the BOPW and they will be getting the electrical completed in the next week or so.  Friesen also stated they have volunteers and looking for more volunteers; they will be painting, etc.  The Girl Scout group will also be doing a fundraiser over the 4th of July weekend.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Brown moved to approve transferring the funds received from the Girl Scout Cabin Renovation Fund from the General Fund to the Park Fund.  Motion seconded by Friesen.

On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Bender moved to approve the appointment of Larry Naiman, Assistant Superintendent of Utilities, as the authorized representative for the City of Fairbury for the federally declared Disaster #FEMA 1878-DR.  Motion seconded by Bailey.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Discussion was held regarding the agenda item “concurring in Code Official Determination that Residence at 709 3rd Street is Unsafe Due to Violation of City Dangerous Building Code as Codified as the Property Maintenance Code of the City of Fairbury, and Consider Concurring in Recommended Action to Proceed Under Demolition Provisions.”  Building Inspector/Code Official Eric Voss stated the Board of Health had met earlier this evening.  The Board of Health followed the ordinance and the dangerous building code as codified by the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) by Ordinance in the City of Fairbury Municipal Code and concurred that the residence at 709 3rd Street is an unsafe structure, violates the City’s dangerous building code as codified as the Property Maintenance Code of the City of Fairbury, and qualifies as a structure that should be demolished per Section 110 of the IPMC. The Board of Health has recommended to proceed under the demolition provisions of the Property Maintenance Code, noting that it is an emergency and a dangerous public health issue, and concurring in the Code Official’s judgment that the structure in question is so old, dilapidated, or has become so out of repair as to be dangerous, unsafe, insanitary, or otherwise unfit for human habitation or occupancy, such that it is unreasonable to repair the structure and should be demolished. Voss gave a brief history of the structure at 709 3rd Street.  It was purchased in March 2007 by Jerry Bryan.  The City has been mowing this piece of property since 2008 and assessing the charges as a lien on the property.  Voss stated he has sent several certified letters to the owner the last three years; they have all been returned unable to forward.  Voss stated he started working on this property back in 2008 to determine the house was uninhabitable and had an asbestos inspection done which came back the structure had no asbestos.  The process was dropped at that time, as someone was going to try to buy the property and tear the house down; but those potential buyers reportedly couldn’t find the owner, so they were not able to purchase the property.  Voss stated within the last year, a tree has fallen in two different places on the house; the last part of the tree that fell actually fell through the house and collapsed part of the house.  The tree is leaning over towards the neighbor’s house and garage, threatening to topple over onto the neighbor’s house and garage.  Voss stated he touched the exterior of one of the walls and it actually moves. Voss shared a power point presentation, that included numerous pictures of the exterior of the house and tree, with the Council.  Bargen stated the process under City Code to declare a house unsafe or qualifying for demolition has changed the last couple of years, when the Council adopted the Property Maintenance Code as its dangerous building code.  The Code Official has the authority to proceed, without the Board of Health and Council approval, by following the proper procedures within the IPMC for a dangerous building.  State Statute 18-1722.01 says that when a building is unsafe because of one or more violations of a municipality’s dangerous building code ordinance, it shall be the duty of such municipality to post the property accordingly, and to file a copy of such determination in the office of the register of deeds of the county to be recorded.  Bargen recited the standard for finding a structure subject to demolition under the Property Maintenance Code, which Section 110.1 states “the code official shall order the owner of any premises upon which is located any structure, which in the code official’s judgment is so old, dilapidated or has become so out of repair as to be dangerous, unsafe, insanitary or otherwise unfit for human habitation or occupancy, and such that it is unreasonable to repair the structure, to demolish and remove such structure.  The code official should carefully document the condition of the structure prior to issuing a demolition order to provide an adequate basis for ordering the owner to remove the structure.  If the owner of a premise fails to comply with a demolition order within the time prescribed, the code official shall cause the structure to be demolished and removed, and the cost of such demolition and removal be charged against the real estate upon which the structure is located and shall be a lien upon the real estate.”  Voss stated he will send a certified letter to the owner regarding the structure directing the owner to demolish the structure, or it will be demolished by the City; if it is returned he will post the notice on the property and proceed according to the code.  Bargen stated the Board of Health and the Council concur that this structure is a dangerous building and should be demolished in accordance with the Code.  Bargen stated since the Council has approved the Property Maintenance Code, Voss does not have to have approval from the Board of Health and the Council per the Code, but it is a good idea to have the approval for the first case since the City has adopted the Property Maintenance Code.  The IPMC also provides means for appeal of the Code Official’s decision.  Davis moved to approve Building Inspector/Code Official Eric Voss to proceed to have the structure at 709 3rd Street demolished.  Motion seconded by Bailey.  Mayor Ward request that Voss put safety tape around the structure immediately and would be a good idea to remove the tree first and then proceed with the demolition of the structure.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Discussion was held regarding the recommendation from the Public Safety Committee regarding the Fire Protection Services and Facility Coordination Agreement between the City of Fairbury and the Fairbury Rural Fire Protection District.  Fire Chief Eric Voss stated the original agreement was done in 1967 when the Rural Fire built onto the north side of the fire station.  This new agreement is basically the same wording.  The Ground Lease, which is the most important document regarding the agreement, will be brought before Council hopefully at the next meeting.  The Public Safety and Rural Fire are going over the Ground Lease before it is brought before Council. Voss would like to have the agreement approved, which would show the City is in agreement with the Rural Fire building onto the south side of the fire station and the City is willing to move forward with this project.  They want to add three bays, a big training room, move Eric’s office downstairs and build an office for the Rural Fire, ADA accessible bathrooms, and updating things at the fire hall.  Voss stated some items in the draft should be amended:  on Page One - #3 it stated north of the fire hall – Voss changed it to south and on Page Three - #5e. it stated the RFD would pay utilities – Voss changed this to the City would pay utilities; the reason being they will have a training room and his offices will be moved downstairs – so he will be in there more than the Rural Fire would be.  Voss stated it was discussed at the Public Safety meeting that on Page Three - #6 – the second sentence for two sentences, where it states the City shall receive all fire calls and make all dispatches,  need to be removed as the Fire Department no longer does this; it is all done at the law enforcement center.  Voss stated this is a simple agreement which he, the Rural Fire Board, and Chief Mark DeBoer are happy with this agreement and want to move forward so they can start building on to the fire hall.  Bender moved to approve the Public Safety’s recommendation regarding the Fire Protection Services and Facility Coordination Agreement between the City of Fairbury and the Fairbury Rural Fire Protection District by striking the two sentences regarding the fire calls and dispatching on Page Three - #6, adding on Page One - #2 the term – add 99 years as per the last agreement, and on Page Two - #5c removing the dollar amount for the maintenance.  Motion seconded by Kuzelka.  Polson questioned if Voss had any amounts of what it would cost to build.  Voss replied not really -had rough estimates of around a half million dollars when they were thinking of merging with EMS.  The Rural Fire will pay for all of this; the expense to the City will be the cost of utilities once it is built.  The City has their part in the land; they will continue to do the services and the work that we do with them right now.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Bender moved to adopt Resolution No. 776 requesting Deed of Reconveyance be executed for purpose of releasing and extinguishing lien and encumbrance of Deed of Trust executed by Cheryl Schroeder (dba Attitudes Apparel), and authorizing the Mayor to sign Beneficiary’s Request on said Deed of Reconveyance.  Motion seconded by Friesen.  Mayor Ward explained Cheryl Schroeder sold the Attitudes Apparel building on 5th Street.  She had defaulted on the Performance Based Grant as she did not fulfill the employment requirement; so she had to pay this back to the City in the amount of $12,815.00 which she has done.  The Deed of Reconveyance will release the lien the City held on the property.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Within the City Administrator’s report Joseph Parker stated the City-Wide Clean Up went very well with a total of 153.61 tons taken in which is down 11.42 tons from last year.  Also they took a total of 471 tires which was up by 129 from last year.  Parker also stated the City is opening the process to receive more applications for demolitions with the Neighborhood Stabilization Program.  Parker stated he received notification from the State yesterday that they have approved eleven demolitions which still have to go through a processing system; also a couple didn’t qualify.  Parker stated the State needs more information on six of the applications that were submitted.  July 31, 2010 is the deadline to have all the dollars committed; have to have the paper work completed and the bids have to be accepted by the end of July.  Parker stated he needs the help of the media to get the word out to the public.  Parker also stated he and Street Superintendent Mick Hynek are working with another recycling company; trying to get a better deal.  They will be coming to the Council for approval.

   

Within the Mayor’s report, Mayor Ward encouraged everyone to get out and vote one week from today.  Mayor Ward stated the County Clerk is expecting a 20-25% voter turnout.

 

Bender stated she had attended the intergenerational meeting held by the Extension Office.  Bender feels this is a very good program and stated ones attending were from the ages of 14 to 88; the younger people are also concerned about our community and want to get involved with different projects.  Barb Schmidt with the Extension Office will be setting up more meetings.  Bender stated this is a good base for our committees to see the future of Fairbury and what we want to go forward with.  Bender stated three of the younger people that were there call themselves “Acts in Motion” – they were responsible for the water and balloons that were in front of different homes and they’re also doing a community garden.  Mayor Ward feels this group and the Industrial Development Committee need to work together.

 

Polson moved to adjourn the meeting.  Motion seconded by Bailey.  On roll call, Brown, Friesen, Bailey, Polson, Bender, Kuzelka, and Davis voted “yes.”  Motion carried.  Meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m.

                                                                         Homer L. Ward, Mayor

           ATTEST:  Sharyl Preston, City Clerk

 

 
 
Thanks for visiting FairburyNebraska.org!
Copyright © 2001-2005 FairburyNebraska.org All Rights Reserved.