City of Fairbury, Nebraska
 
   
City of Fairbury, Nebraska:
 
    City Council
          Administration
          Agendas - Minutes
          Meeting Schedule

    City Departments
    City Services
    Community Events
    Facts and Statistics
    General Information
    Mayor of Fairbury
    Parks and Recreation
 
    Home
    Links
    Sitemap

Regular Meeting

April 3, 2007

 

The Mayor and Council of the City of Fairbury met in regular session at the Community Building in the City Park, Fairbury, Nebraska, on the 3rd day of April, 2007, at 7:30 p.m.  Mayor E.M. Mueller called the meeting to order.

 

Notice of meeting was given in advance thereof by publication in the Fairbury Journal News, Fairbury, Nebraska, the designated method of giving notice, as shown by affidavit of publication.  The Open Meetings Act was posted in the meeting room as required by law.

 

Roll call found the following Council Members present:  Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Bender, Fry, and Polson.

 

Mayor Mueller read the Consent Agenda.  (1)Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of March 20, 2007.  (2) Approval of claims.  Nelson made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda.  Motion seconded by Phillips.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Bender, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Mayor Mueller opened sealed bids received for various property and liability insurance coverage.  Bids received were as follows:  Starr Buckow Insurance Agency, $184,692.00; League Association of Risk Management (LARM), $273,584.00.  Mayor Mueller stated bids received will be turned over to the Finance Committee for review.  City Administrator Jim Ferneau stated bids received are for two different kids of policies and that the Finance Committee would need to review the bids and make comparisons.  Ron Starr of Starr Buckow Agency stated bids provided were for coverage with Berkshire Hathaway Homestead Company, that his agency is a local, independent agency who pays local taxes, is easy to contact, and gets involved in the community.  Yvonne Svec of LARM stated her organization is presenting an offer of membership to self-insure as part of a group.  Svec also stated her agency is an intergovernmental risk management agency, not an insurance carrier, but is regulated like one to ensure they are able to pay losses that come in.  Svec explained LARM’s governing structure.  Bender inquired as to whether municipalities have to pick up costs from other municipalities’ losses in the form of assessments.  Svec stated that has never happened to date and that there would have to be a series of storms over many many years to cause that due to the way LARM is structured.  Noerrlinger asked what legal defense is provided when a claim is submitted by a municipality; Svec stated local law firms handle claims where legal representation is required.  No action was taken; bids were referred to the Finance Committee for review.

 

The Council considered the recommendation from the Reuse Committee to make a business loan to Russ Furrow, Russ’s Repair & Salvage, in the amount of $18,000 at an interest rate of 3% for a term of 36 months.  Bender asked if the business, which is currently located out of town, would be moving to town; Furrow stated yes, his business is moving into an existing business that is closed at the moment.  Byrd made a motion to approve the Reuse Committee’s recommendation.  Motion seconded by Trimm.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Bender, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Mick Hynek addressed the Council regarding a request from Joel Austin for a curb cut at 5th & C Streets, stating Austin is putting in a driveway at the old Coop building and needs a curb cut to do so.  Brown inquired as to whether the curb cut had already been done; Hynek stated part of the curb was already taken out when Austin was informed he had to get a curb cut and do things the legal way.  Nelson made a motion to approve Austin’s request for a curb cut at 5th & C Streets.  Motion seconded by Phillips.  On roll call, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Bender, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Brown voted “no.”  Motion carried.

 

The Council considered approving a proposal from Municipal Code Services, Inc. for code updating services.  Noerrlinger stated updates especially need done this year to have the code correctly reflect the laws of Fairbury due to ordinances passed in the last year.  Byrd made a motion to approve the proposal from Municipal Code Services, Inc.  Motion seconded by Nelson.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Bender, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Mayor Mueller announced that public comment on the upcoming agenda items dealing with budget cuts would be limited to three minutes per individual.

 

The Council considered the elimination or retention of Street & Alley Department projects in the four year budget.  Ferneau stated clarification of the previous meeting’s decisions regarding street projects on 27th Street south of Wal-Mart and H Street west of Wal-Mart was needed.  Ferneau stated the projects would remain in the One & Six Year Plan regardless of the decision.  Trimm made a motion to eliminate the two street projects.  Motion seconded by Phillips.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Bender, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

A decision on the elimination or retention of the City Administrator position was considered.  Ferneau addressed the Council, stating although capital projects and equipment replacements had been eliminated from the budget, it was now necessary to look at personnel and positions cuts to meet the goal of a balanced budget.  Citizen Pam Schroeder stated the first place to look at with cuts is the City Administrator.  Schoeder stated the Administrator hasn’t saved the City a whole lot of money in the last two years and hasn’t helped the fire chief write any grants.  Bender stated the Mayor made a promise to the Council that the Administrator would fulfill making his wages in grants and efficiency and that he also promised not one city employee would lose his job if the City Administrator were hired.  Mayor Mueller stated that if the City did not have an Administrator, he would not want to see the City’s finances.  Bender made a motion to eliminate the City Administrator position.  Motion seconded by Byrd.  Nelson expressed concerns that without a City Administrator, the City would be looking at far worse cuts.  Nelson stated emphasis should be placed on having a financially stable City.  Citizen Jeri Katz asked the Council to seriously consider retaining the City Administrator.  Discussion ceased.  On roll call, Bender voted “yes.”  Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Fry, and Polson voted “no.”  Motion failed.  Nelson made a motion to retain the City Administrator position.  Motion seconded by Trimm.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Trimm, Nelson, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Byrd and Bender voted “no.”  Motion carried.

 

A decision on the elimination or retention of the hiring of a Library Director in the four year budget was considered.  Phillips made a motion to eliminate the hiring of a Library Director.  Motion seconded by Fry.  Bender inquired as to how much would be lost due to lack of accreditation, stating the library would be unable to apply for grants.  Ferneau stated $1000 - $1200 in cash would be lost in addition to the Library losing e-rate and inter-library loan capabilities.  Bender asked if an existing staff member could move up into the position.  Ferneau stated no one wants to move into the position and that the lack of director causes problems with accreditation.  Jean Naiman, Children’s Librarian, stated accreditation is secured through 2009 but that at that time a director will be necessary.  Naiman stated accreditation means a lot to the library, allowing the library to do inter-library loan, e-rate, OCLC cataloguing, and providing for marked records for books.  Discussion ceased.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, and Fry voted “yes.”  Bender and Polson voted “no.”  Motion carried.

 

A decision to either accept the Fire Department employees reduced pay proposal or to eliminate two Assistant Fire Chief positions was considered.  City Attorney Tim Noerrlinger advised the proposal could not be accepted until it goes through the employees’ union.  Fire Chief Eric Voss stated a decision to eliminate the 2 Assistant Fire Chief positions would change the way fire protection is provided in Fairbury in regards to response time and command rules.  Voss asked Council to renegotiate with the employees.  Citizens speaking in support of retaining the Assistant Chief positions were Stan Schiermeyer (President of the City Volunteer Fire Department), Jon Novotny, Elvis Carbaugh, Dan Stanton, Shirley Carmichael, Kendall Schlake, Jan Grummert, Marlys Bryan, Jim Frager, Ed Durfee, Chris Goeking, and Dick Hoppe.  Letters of support written by the following were read: Fairbury Clinic Physicians, Heritage Care Center, Tetra Micronutrients, Prairie View Industries, Fairbury Public Schools, and Jefferson Community Health Center.  Individuals addressing the Council and letters read focused on the need for immediate response, concerns for fire protection for life and property, property insurance costs, and local economic impact.  Figures and the amount of money to be saved through the elimination of the Assistant Chief positions were disputed.  Bender expressed concern for the economic impact of job eliminations.  Bender made a motion to send the Fire Department employees reduced pay proposal to the union for negotiation.  Motion seconded by Byrd.  On roll call, Byrd and Bender voted “yes.”  Brown, Phillips, Trimm, Nelson, Fry, and Polson voted “no.”  Motion failed.  Nelson made a motion to eliminate the two Assistant Fire Chief positions.  Motion seconded by Fry.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Trimm, Nelson, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Byrd and Bender voted “no.”  Motion carried.

 

A decision on the elimination of 1 – 2 Police Officer positions from the four year budget was considered.  Noerrlinger stated that in accordance with the CWA contract, any eliminations made in the Police Department are to be done in order of seniority, not by position, regardless of what positions are eliminated.  Jay Boyle of the CWA addressed the Council stating he and Sergeant Doug Klaumann put together a reduced pay proposal and that they were not even shown the courtesy of having that proposal on the agenda.  Boyle stated first response services should be the last to be cut, not the first.  Klaumann asked Council to retain all officer positions, stating drug problems, thefts, and arrests are increasing.  Klaumann asked the Council for the opportunity to see if their proposal could work and was displeased it was not on the agenda for consideration.  Bender stated the City owns the municipal electric system and that if the Council needs money for necessities, it should take it from the Board of Public Works instead of taking those necessities away from the citizens.  Sheriff Nels Sorenson stated that the Sheriff’s Department and the Police Department are a combined effort and that even with 8 officers, they are stretched thin.  Lieutenant Wade Vernon stated he was present at the last Public Safety Committee meeting where the committee voted to have their proposal sent to the Council.  Vernon inquired as to why the proposal, which would save the City more money than these cuts would, was not placed on the agenda for consideration.  Others speaking in favor of retaining the positions were Kylee Helmink, Allison Grummert, Jessica Schwartz, Tammie Davis, Dick Allen, Steve Vanderslice, Devin Lovgren, Marlys Bryan, and Joy Gaston.  Those speaking in support of retaining the positions expressed concern for officer safety and public safety.  Suggestions were made to eliminate the City Administrator instead of the officer positions. Ferneau stated if the Council wants to bargain with the Police Department, they certainly can.  Noerrlinger advised the City is required to give the Police Department and the CWA a sixty-day notice of job cuts during which time the City is required to bargain with them and talk seriously about other cost saving alternatives.  When asked, Noerrlinger also stated special legal counsel would be needed for these negotiations, as he is not a labor law attorney.  Trimm stated the committee did review the Police Department employees’ proposal; Mayor Mueller confirmed this.  Discussion ceased.  Fry made a motion to eliminate one Police Officer position.  Motion seconded by Trimm.  Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, and Fry voted “yes.”  Nelson, Bender, and Polson voted “no.”  Motion carried.

 

A decision to eliminate or retain the Police Secretary position in the four year budget was considered.  Ferneau prefaced the discussion by stating that with cuts already made during this meeting, the City is now almost at a balanced budget over the next four years.  Brown inquired if action to eliminate would eliminate the position or the person who currently is the Police Secretary.  Noerrlinger and Ferneau both stated this would eliminate the position.  Byrd stated this cut would take officers off the roads because people will be coming into the police station for assistance that is normally provided by the Police Secretary.  Vernon concurred with Byrd, stating the Police Secretary is paid to do clerical work in the office and that the public coming in to a locked door will generate numerous complaints.  Noerrlinger spoke on behalf of the County Attorney’s office, stating a Police Secretary who writes police reports that are needed for the County Attorney’s office to prosecute charges is necessary.  Noerrlinger stated not having a Police Secretary will cause problems for the County Attorney in regards to prosecutions.  Sheriff Sorenson stated his office manager already has a full plate and inquired as to where the current Police Secretary duties, calls, and problems would be directed.  Sorenson implored the Council to retain the Police Secretary, stating there is a limit to what the Sheriff’s Department has capabilities of doing.  Trimm made a motion to eliminate the Police Secretary position.  Motion seconded by Brown.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Trimm, and Fry voted “yes.”  Byrd, Nelson, Polson, and Bender voted “no.”  Mayor Mueller voted “yes” to break the tie.  Motion carried.

 

A decision to eliminate or retain the Assistant Street Superintendent position in the four year budget was considered.  Street & Sanitation Superintendent Mick Hynek addressed the Council, stating Tim Fuentez (Assistant Street Superintendent) is very knowledgeable in the office, and helps the Street & Alley and Sanitation Departments in the field as needed.  Hynek stated he would like the Council to retain the position.  Fuentez stated that at a previous meeting he had welcomed any Councilmember to visit his office and that no one came to speak with him about his position and its responsibilities.  Fuentez stated he helps the Sanitation Department with billing and runs the Public Works office when needed.  Trimm requested Fuentez outline his qualifications.  Fuentez stated he is a licensed Street Superintendent, works with Auto CAD, works with the Light & Water Department on mapping and locating, does the bookwork, and is the secretary for the Planning Commission and the Board of Adjustment.  Frager spoke in support of Fuentez stating that whenever he has questions regarding maps, Fuentez has been the only one who could get the answers needed.  Dick Allen also spoke in support of retaining the Assistant Superintendent position.  Trimm made a motion to retain the Assistant Street Superintendent position.  Motion seconded by Byrd.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Bender, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Phillips made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 654 providing for the suspension of the hiring freeze to hire a new Police Chief and repealing any resolutions in conflict herewith.  Motion seconded by Byrd.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Bender voted “no.”  Motion carried.

 

Mayor Mueller read by title Resolution No. 655 providing for the amendment of the City’s Economic Development Plan and repealing Resolution No. 477 and any other resolutions in conflict herewith.  Phillips made a motion to go into executive session for the purpose of discussing Resolution No. 655, reason being threat of potential litigation connected to this matter, designating those to remain as City Attorney Tim Noerrlinger, City Administrator Jim Ferneau, and City Clerk Tami Arnold.  Motion seconded by Trimm.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Bender voted “no.”  Motion carried.  Mayor Mueller restated the subject matter to be discussed during executive session was Resolution No. 655.  Executive session entered at 9:38 p.m.

 

Nelson made a motion to enter into open session at 10:00 p.m.  Motion seconded by Phillips.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Bender, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Motion carried.  Bender made a motion to deny passage of Resolution No. 655 and instruct the City Attorney to draft a resolution amending Economic Development funding to be in compliance with Resolution No. 477.  Motion seconded by Brown.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Bender, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Motion carried.

 

Mayor Mueller read by title Ordinance No. 2956:  AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FAIRBURY, NEBRASKA PERTAINING TO BUSINESS REGULATIONS; GAS DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES; TAX; TO REPEAL ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR A TIME WHEN THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.  Bender made a motion to give third reading and final passage to Ordinance No. 2956.  Motion seconded by Byrd.  On roll call, Byrd, Bender, and Polson voted “yes.”  Brown, Phillips, Trimm, Nelson, and Fry voted “no.”  Motion failed.

 

Mayor Mueller read by title Ordinance No. 2957:  AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AQUILA, INC., D/B/A AQUILA NETWORKS, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ITS LESSEES, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS, A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE, RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE FOR A PERIOD OF FIFTEEN (15) YEARS TO ERECT, MAINTAIN, AND OPERATE A GAS PLANT AND GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND ANY AND ALL NECESSARY PIPES, MAINS, SERVICES, AND OTHER APPLIANCES THEREUNTO APPERTAINING, IN, UPON, OVER, ACROSS, AND ALONG THE STREETS, ALLEYS, BRIDGES, AND PUBLIC PLACES OF THE CITY OF FAIRBURY, NEBRASKA, AS THE SAME NOW ARE OR MAY HEREAFTER BE EXTENDED, FOR THE MANUFACTURE, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION AND SALE OF GAS, WHETHER ARTIFICIAL, NATURAL, OR OTHERWISE, FOR COOKING, HEATING, INDUSTRIAL, AND ALL OTHER USES AND PURPOSES IN SAID CITY AND PRESCRIBING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE SAID COMPANY IS TO OPERATE.  Bender made a motion to give third reading and final passage to Ordinance No. 2957.  Motion seconded by Byrd.  Noerrlinger stated that if this ordinance is not passed, Aquila will no longer have the right to have their lines on our right-of-ways and that Aquila will no longer be required to pay our franchise fees.  Noerrlinger asked the Council for direction as to renegotiation.  Rick Schwartz of Aquila stated his organization is a revenue source who believes in community involvement.  Schwartz reassured the Council that Black Hills will uphold terms of the contract, as they are legally required to do.  Schwartz stated he believed all issues and concerns were resolved on the first two readings.  Trimm asked why the Council was not negotiating with Black Hills instead of Aquila.  Bender stated agreement says it is binding to all successors and assigns.  Bender inquired as to whether the citizens of Fairbury would be in danger of losing gas service.  Noerrlinger advised that as long as Aquila’s service lines are in the City’s right-of-ways, citizens will continue to receive service.  Noerrlinger also stated there are other municipalities that do not have franchise agreements.  Noerrlinger confirmed the agreement contains an heirs and assigns clause and is legally binding regardless of who the owner is.  Brown, Trimm, Bender, and Polson voted “yes.”  Phillips, Byrd, Nelson, and Fry voted “no.”  Mayor Mueller voted “no” to break the tie.  Motion failed.

 

Nelson made a motion to adjourn the meeting.  Motion seconded by Bender.  On roll call, Brown, Phillips, Byrd, Trimm, Nelson, Bender, Fry, and Polson voted “yes.”  Motion carried.  Meeting adjourned at 10:25 p.m.

 

                                                                                                                                      E. M. Mueller, Mayor

ATTEST:

     Tami Arnold, City Clerk

 

   
 
 
Thanks for visiting FairburyNebraska.org!
Copyright © 2001-2005 FairburyNebraska.org All Rights Reserved.